Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the regressions

From: Rankings, accreditations, and international exchange students

 

Model 1

Model 2

accr

0.27* (0.055)

0.097 (0.072)

accrank

−0.19* (0.075)

−0.19* (0.074)

m_accrank

−0.53 (0.61)

−0.75 (0.63)

thes

−0.0023* (0.00077)

−0.0036* (0.0012)

thesrank

0.0065* (0.0013)

0.0065* (0.0014)

m_thesrank

−0.023* (0.011)

−0.027* (0.012)

top200

0.0043 (0.071)

−0.011 (0.073)

top200rank

−0.00018 (0.00036)

−0.00017 (0.00035)

m_ top200rank

0.000052 (0.0012)

−0.00038 (0.0013)

graderequisite

−1.3* (0.14)

−1.3* (0.11)

new

0.15 (0.077)

−0.0046 (0.056)

lnq

0.031* (0.013)

0.074* (0.01)

m_lnq

0.008 (0.038)

−0.036 (0.036)

relrank

3.4 (2.4)

4.3 (2.5)

pricelevel

0.16 (0.3)

−0.49 (0.34)

gni

0.000014* (0.000005)

−0.000016 (0.000012)

internetusers

−0.0052 (0.0028)

 

coast

0.077 (0.089)

 

pop

0 (0)

 

private

−0.048 (0.079)

 

foundation

0.00001 (0.00013)

 

latitude

−0.014* (0.0052)

 

students

0.00000 (0.00000)

 

english

−0.094 (0.095)

 

spanish

0.22 (0.16)

 

french

−0.18 (0.098)

 

asiapacific

−0.43 (0.24)

 

aus-nz-sa

−0.07 (0.15)

 

centraleurope

−0.33* (0.1)

 

easterneurope

0.08 (0.22)

 

latinamerica

−0.5 (0.33)

 

mediterraneaneurope

−0.14 (0.17)

 

northamerica

−0.23* (0.11)

 

northerneurope

0.24 (0.13)

 

application round fixed effects

Yes

Yes

university fixed effects

No

Yes

Nr. of observations

306580

303649

% of correctly predicted successes

13.3%

18.9%

  1. a. * indicates significance at the 5% level.
  2. b. In the fixed-effects specification there are 2931 less observations, as 6 universities have been dropped because the time-constant fixed-effect predicts the failure perfectly (i.e., 6 universities have never been chosen).