Skip to main content

Table 6 Interview invitation probabilities in comparison

From: Anonymous job applications in Europe

 

Process 1

Process 2a

Process 2b

Process 5

Process 6

Process 7

Process 8a

Process 8b

Process 9a

Process 9b

(a) Anonymous

−0.757 (0.503)

−0.090*** (0.030)

−0.275*** (0.046)

−0.016 (0.091)

0.147* (0.079)

−0.049 (0.049)

0.112*** (0.041)

0.005 (0.064)

0.457*** (0.101)

0.407*** (0.102)

(b) Female

−0.200 (0.500)

−0.034 (0.025)

−0.058 (0.048)

0.013 (0.035)

0.044 (0.055)

0.082 (0.071)

0.093*** (0.024)

0.156* (0.085)

0.096 (0.111)

0.029 (0.117)

(c) Migrant

0.118 (0.286)

−0.039 (0.028)

−0.122** (0.050)

−0.056*** (0.021)

0.013 (0.062)

−0.043 (0.059)

−0.084 (0.064)

0.160 (0.161)

−0.088 (0.105)

0.091 (0.112)

(d) Anonymous x Female

0.570 (0.526)

0.066* (0.038)

0.099* (0.056)

0.156 (0.101)

−0.056 (0.083)

−0.064 (0.097)

−0.086** (0.041)

−0.148 (0.091)

−0.022 (0.118)

0.048 (0.126)

(e) Anonymous x Migrant

−0.152 (0.326)

−0.013 (0.040)

0.072 (0.058)

0.118 (0.118)

−0.046 (0.085)

0.039 (0.081)

0.192 (0.119)

−0.051 (0.190)

0.019 (0.120)

−0.155 (0.124)

Δ: Sum (a) + (d)

−0.187 (0.178)

−0.024 (0.034)

−0.176*** (0.046)

0.140* (0.072)

0.091* (0.050)

−0.113 (0.093)

0.026 (0.041)

−0.144** (0.067)

0.436*** (0.114)

0.455*** (0.126)

Δ: Sum (a) + (e)

−0.909 (0.589)

−0.102** (0.041)

−0.204*** (0.060)

0.102 (0.121)

0.101 (0.087)

−0.009 (0.070)

0.305** (0.121)

−0.046 (0.189)

0.476*** (0.103)

0.252** (0.112)

R 2

0.3149

0.0383

0.1138

0.1802

0.0449

0.0490

0.0201

0.0206

0.2772

0.2855

# Observations

48

1.545

920

238

340

496

2.166

938

190

155

  1. Source: Data provided by organizations taking part in German experiment.
  2. *** significant at 1%; ** significant at 5%; * significant at 10%.
  3. Linear probability model. Robust standard errors in parentheses. Control variables include (if available) age, age squared, schooling degree, vocational degree, number of previous employers, work experience (in years) and number of internships. Processes 2a/b, 8a/b, 9a/b display analyses of the same treatment group with two different control groups. No data on control groups were available for processes 3 and 4.