Table 1 Difference between assigned individuals in final sample and dropped assigned individuals
From: Can public works programs mitigate the impact of crises in Europe? The case of Latvia
Remaining Treatment-Dropped treatment | T-test: Remaining Treatment = Dropped treatment | Remaining Control-Dropped control | T-test: Remaining Control = Dropped Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Difference | T-Stat | Difference | T-Stat | |
Age 18-24 | −0.004 | (−0.25) | −0.046 | (−1.83) |
Age 25-29 | 0.004 | (0.23) | −0.004 | (−0.18) |
Age 30-39 | 0.024 | (1.00) | 0.050 | (1.90) |
Male | 0.047 | (1.56) | −0.035 | (−0.96) |
Household head | 0.006 | (0.23) | 0.022 | (0.63) |
Spouse of household head | −0.032 | (−1.34) | −0.008 | (−0.29) |
Single | 0.025 | (1.02) | −0.057 | (−1.82) |
Married | 0.042 | (1.45) | −0.035 | (−1.05) |
Share of members in age 0-5 | −0.459 | (−0.65) | −0.931 | (−0.95) |
Share of members in age 6-17 | 0.525 | (0.48) | 1.089 | (0.77) |
Share of members in age 1864 | −0.368 | (−0.25) | 0.966 | (0.53) |
Household size | 0.043 | (0.44) | 0.013 | (0.12) |
Unemployed 12 months ago | 0.045 | (1.48) | −0.066 | (−1.82) |
Secondary education | −0.004 | (−0.15) | −0.011 | (−0.34) |
Secondary profession | −0.026 | (−0.90) | −0.000 | (−0.00) |
Higher education | 0.026 | (1.77) | −0.050** | (−2.74) |
Own a flat | 0.007 | (0.25) | −0.023 | (−0.64) |
Own a house | −0.033 | (−1.57) | 0.014 | (0.66) |
House is owned by state | 0.011 | (0.43) | 0.070* | (2.26) |
House is owned by private entity | −0.005 | (−0.27) | −0.046 | (−1.66) |
Have other Dwelling in other parts of Latvia | 0.002 | (0.11) | 0.011 | (0.56) |
House have 1 room | 0.008 | (0.30) | −0.013 | (−0.42) |
2 room | −0.018 | (−0.61) | 0.060 | (1.67) |
3 room | 0.038 | (1.46) | −0.030 | (−0.95) |
Detached/semi-detached House | 0.012 | (0.39) | −0.005 | (−0.14) |
Flat in apartment | −0.007 | (−0.70) | −0.018 | (−1.68) |
Wooden wall | 0.015 | (0.62) | 0.105*** | (3.46) |
Concrete wall | −0.027 | (−1.10) | −0.059 | (−1.90) |
Number of observations | 1163 | 1016 | ||