Table 3 Regressions
From: Higher education and economic innovation, a comparison of European countries
Impact of performance on economic innovation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | Coef. | S.E. | t | P > t | 95% confidence interval | |
Research | 0.50 | 0.14 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.80 |
Internationalization | 0.31 | 0.14 | 2.15 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.61 |
Grad/empl | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.77 | 0.75 | -0.16 | 0.37 |
_cons | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -0.27 | 0.27 |
R2 = 0.50; N = 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Impact of policy indicators on research performance | ||||||
|  | Coef. | S.E. | t | P > t | 95% confidence interval | |
Funding | 0.52 | 0.14 | 3.50 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.83 |
Policy aut. | -0.12 | 0.15 | -0.81 | 0.42 | -0.43 | 0.18 |
Manag. Aut | 0.36 | 0.15 | 2.46 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.66 |
_cons | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -0.29 | 0.29 |
R2 = 0.39; N = 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Impact of policies on internationalization | ||||||
|  | Coef. | S.E. | t | P > t | 95% confidence interval | |
Funding | 0.58 | 0.15 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.88 |
Policy aut. | 0.00 | 0.15 | -0.03 | 0.97 | -0.31 | 0.30 |
Manag. Aut | -0.26 | 0.14 | -1.76 | 0.08 | -0.56 | 0.04 |
_cons | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -0.29 | 0.29 |
R2 = 0.39; N = 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Impact of policies on graduation and employment | ||||||
|  | Coef. | S.E. | t | P > t | 95% confidence interval | |
Funding | -0.10 | 0.18 | -0.58 | 0.56 | -0.48 | 0.26 |
Policy aut. | 0.26 | 0.18 | 1.44 | 0.16 | -0.11 | 0.64 |
Manag. Aut | -0.18 | 0.18 | -1.04 | 0.30 | -0.55 | 0.18 |
_cons | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -0.36 | 0.36 |
R2 = 0.08; N = 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |