Skip to main content

Table 4 Difference-in-differences estimates (log. of different types of expenditure, 2006 and 2009)

From: Did tuition fees in Germany constrain students’ budgets? New evidence from a natural experiment

Expenditure for

 

Pooled

Men

Women

  

Raw

With covariates

Raw

With covariates

Raw

With covariates

Total

Coeff.

−0.032**

−0.035***

−0.010

−0.018

−0.047***

−0.047***

S.E.

(0.013)

(0.013)

(0.021)

(0.020)

(0.017)

(0.016)

Rent

Coeff.

−0.384***

−0.382***

−0.323***

−0.327***

−0.423***

−0.418***

S.E.

(0.042)

(0.041)

(0.069)

(0.069)

(0.051)

(0.051)

Food

Coeff.

−0.069**

−0.068**

−0.046

−0.052

−0.087**

−0.080**

S.E.

(0.030)

(0.029)

(0.047)

(0.047)

(0.038)

(0.037)

Clothes

Coeff.

0.058*

0.051*

0.086*

0.077

0.044

0.036

S.E.

(0.031)

(0.031)

(0.051)

(0.051)

(0.037)

(0.038)

Learning materials

Coeff.

−0.024

−0.032

−0.005

−0.012

−0.034

−0.046

S.E.

(0.029)

(0.029)

(0.048)

(0.048)

(0.036)

(0.036)

Car

Coeff.

0.154***

0.119**

0.157*

0.101

0.145**

0.127*

S.E.

(0.058)

(0.057)

(0.093)

(0.091)

(0.073)

(0.072)

Public transport

Coeff.

−0.078*

−0.031

0.072

0.130*

−0.181***

−0.146***

S.E.

(0.043)

(0.043)

(0.067)

(0.067)

(0.056)

(0.055)

Medical insurance, medical fees

Coeff.

0.091*

0.081*

0.157**

0.118*

0.049

0.049

S.E.

(0.049)

(0.044)

(0.078)

(0.070)

(0.061)

(0.056)

Fees for telephone, internet

Coeff.

−0.030

−0.049

0.032

0.001

−0.072*

−0.082**

S.E.

(0.032)

(0.031)

(0.052)

(0.052)

(0.040)

(0.039)

Leisure, culture, sports

Coeff.

−0.058

−0.074**

0.035

0.015

−0.124***

−0.135***

S.E.

(0.036)

(0.036)

(0.060)

(0.061)

(0.045)

(0.045)

No. of observations

 

25,361

25,361

10,445

10,445

14,916

14,916

  1. Note: difference-in-differences estimates are displayed (obtained from ordinary least square estimations with the logarithm of different expenditure as dependent variable). Next to the difference-in-differences estimate, the model includes a dummy variable for the treatment group and a dummy variable for 2009 (after the reform) as well as controls for socio-demographic background variables (gender, citizenship, indicator for having siblings, age, age squared), studying time (in semesters), studying time squared, a dummy variable that indicates whether the student has completed an apprenticeship before studying, dummy variables for the parents’ position in their job, and dummy variables for federal states. * denotes statistical significance at the 10% level, ** at the 5% level and *** at the 1% level. See text for further details. Source: 18th and 19th Social Survey of the DZHW, own calculations