Workers receiving old-age benefits in t
0
|
---|
| Odds ratio | Standard error | Odds ratio | Standard error |
---|
Age (years) |
50–54 | 1 | | 1 | |
55–59 | 1.747b
| 0.268 | 1.748b
| 0.267 |
60–64 | 4.094b
| 1.342 | 3.746b
| 0.887 |
>65 | | | 3.068b
| 1.050 |
Sex |
Males | 1 | | 1 | |
Females | 1.441a
| 0.211 | 1.460b
| 0.198 |
Δunemployment rate− c
| 0.827b
| 0.040 | 0.866b
| 0.039 |
Log likelihood | −582.66 | | −640.32 | |
LR | 42.95 (df = 4) | | 57.99 (df = 5) | |
p value | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
McFadden’s adj. R
2
| 0.036 | | 0.043 | |
Sensitivity | 45.92%d
| | 53.02%e
| |
Specificity | 68.46%d
| | 64.86%e
| |
Correctly classified | 60.41%d
| | 60.40%e
| |
- The sample comprised individuals aged either 50–59 (females) and 50–64 (males) or workers aged 50+; annual data for the time period 2004–2010. Sample size for the workers aged 50–59 (females) and 50–64 (males)—927 observations; for the workers aged 50+—1010 observations
-
asignificant at the 5% level; bsignificant at the 1% level
-
cRefers to a 1 percentage point change in the negative change in the unemployment rate
-
dCut-off level in the classification table 0.3571 (based on the share of the outflow in the whole sample)
-
eCut-off level in the classification table 0.3772 (based on the share of the outflow in the whole sample)
- Source: authors’ calculations; data sources: LFS