From: Labour force participation elasticities and the move away from a flat tax: the case of Slovakia
Dataset | Subsample for estimation | SK-SILC 2010–2012 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Mean | Std. dev. | Mean | Std. dev. |
Active | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Employed | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Gains to work (in euros, monthly) | 519.2 | 168.6 | 437.6 | 237.4 |
Log of gains to work | 6.2 | 0.3 | 6.1 | 0.5 |
Non-labour income (in euros, monthly) | 1110.3 | 632.1 | 1133.4 | 633.9 |
Log of non-labour income | 6.8 | 0.6 | 6.9 | 0.6 |
Male | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Female | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Education: primary | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Education: secondary | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
Education: tertiary | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Age | 42.4 | 16.5 | 39.9 | 21.0 |
Years of experience | 19.0 | 14.8 | 17.4 | 15.5 |
Chronic disease | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Parent with child under 3Â years | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Parent with child over 3Â years | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Pensioner | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Student | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Working partner | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Family: married | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Family: separated, divorced, or widowed | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Density: dense | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Density: average | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Density: sparse | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Region: Bratislava | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Trnava | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Trencin | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Nitra | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Zilina | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Banska Bystrica | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Region: Presov | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Region: Kosice | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
Sample size | 37,960 | Â | 46,191 | Â |